Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Stratospheri...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Stratospheric Climates in Chemistry Versus No-Chemistry Climate Models

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Stratospheric Climates in Chemistry Versus No-Chemistry Climate Models. / Morgenstern, Olaf; Kinnison, Douglas E.; Mills, Michael et al.
In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 127, No. 20, e2022JD037123, 27.10.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Morgenstern, O, Kinnison, DE, Mills, M, Michou, M, Horowitz, LW, Lin, P, Deushi, M, Yoshida, K, O’Connor, FM, Tang, Y, Abraham, NL, Keeble, J, Dennison, F, Rozanov, E, Egorova, T, Sukhodolov, T & Zeng, G 2022, 'Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Stratospheric Climates in Chemistry Versus No-Chemistry Climate Models', Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 127, no. 20, e2022JD037123. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037123

APA

Morgenstern, O., Kinnison, D. E., Mills, M., Michou, M., Horowitz, L. W., Lin, P., Deushi, M., Yoshida, K., O’Connor, F. M., Tang, Y., Abraham, N. L., Keeble, J., Dennison, F., Rozanov, E., Egorova, T., Sukhodolov, T., & Zeng, G. (2022). Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Stratospheric Climates in Chemistry Versus No-Chemistry Climate Models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 127(20), Article e2022JD037123. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037123

Vancouver

Morgenstern O, Kinnison DE, Mills M, Michou M, Horowitz LW, Lin P et al. Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Stratospheric Climates in Chemistry Versus No-Chemistry Climate Models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2022 Oct 27;127(20):e2022JD037123. doi: 10.1029/2022JD037123

Author

Morgenstern, Olaf ; Kinnison, Douglas E. ; Mills, Michael et al. / Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Stratospheric Climates in Chemistry Versus No-Chemistry Climate Models. In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2022 ; Vol. 127, No. 20.

Bibtex

@article{467082f14079469da4495e7268fdbe21,
title = "Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Stratospheric Climates in Chemistry Versus No-Chemistry Climate Models",
abstract = "Using nine chemistry-climate and eight associated no-chemistry models, we investigate the persistence and timing of cold episodes occurring in the Arctic and Antarctic stratosphere during the period 1980–2014. We find systematic differences in behavior between members of these model pairs. In a first group of chemistry models whose dynamical configurations mirror their no-chemistry counterparts, we find an increased persistence of such cold polar vortices, such that these cold episodes often start earlier and last longer, relative to the times of occurrence of the lowest temperatures. Also the date of occurrence of the lowest temperatures, both in the Arctic and the Antarctic, is often delayed by 1–3 weeks in chemistry models, versus their no-chemistry counterparts. This behavior exacerbates a widespread problem occurring in most or all models, a delayed occurrence, in the median, of the most anomalously cold day during such cold winters. In a second group of model pairs there are differences beyond just ozone chemistry. In particular, here the chemistry models feature more levels in the stratosphere, a raised model top, and differences in non-orographic gravity wave drag versus their no-chemistry counterparts. Such additional dynamical differences can completely mask the above influence of ozone chemistry. The results point toward a need to retune chemistry-climate models versus their no-chemistry counterparts.",
keywords = "climate model, deep coupling, non-orographic gravity wave, ozone depletion, ozone-climate interaction, tuning",
author = "Olaf Morgenstern and Kinnison, {Douglas E.} and Michael Mills and Martine Michou and Horowitz, {Larry W.} and Pu Lin and Makoto Deushi and Kohei Yoshida and O{\textquoteright}Connor, {Fiona M.} and Yongming Tang and Abraham, {N. Luke} and James Keeble and Fraser Dennison and Eugene Rozanov and Tatiana Egorova and Timofei Sukhodolov and Guang Zeng",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Commonwealth of Australia and National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the King{\textquoteright}s Printer for Scotland. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1029/2022JD037123",
language = "English",
volume = "127",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres",
issn = "2169-897X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "20",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Stratospheric Climates in Chemistry Versus No-Chemistry Climate Models

AU - Morgenstern, Olaf

AU - Kinnison, Douglas E.

AU - Mills, Michael

AU - Michou, Martine

AU - Horowitz, Larry W.

AU - Lin, Pu

AU - Deushi, Makoto

AU - Yoshida, Kohei

AU - O’Connor, Fiona M.

AU - Tang, Yongming

AU - Abraham, N. Luke

AU - Keeble, James

AU - Dennison, Fraser

AU - Rozanov, Eugene

AU - Egorova, Tatiana

AU - Sukhodolov, Timofei

AU - Zeng, Guang

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Commonwealth of Australia and National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the King’s Printer for Scotland. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

PY - 2022/10/27

Y1 - 2022/10/27

N2 - Using nine chemistry-climate and eight associated no-chemistry models, we investigate the persistence and timing of cold episodes occurring in the Arctic and Antarctic stratosphere during the period 1980–2014. We find systematic differences in behavior between members of these model pairs. In a first group of chemistry models whose dynamical configurations mirror their no-chemistry counterparts, we find an increased persistence of such cold polar vortices, such that these cold episodes often start earlier and last longer, relative to the times of occurrence of the lowest temperatures. Also the date of occurrence of the lowest temperatures, both in the Arctic and the Antarctic, is often delayed by 1–3 weeks in chemistry models, versus their no-chemistry counterparts. This behavior exacerbates a widespread problem occurring in most or all models, a delayed occurrence, in the median, of the most anomalously cold day during such cold winters. In a second group of model pairs there are differences beyond just ozone chemistry. In particular, here the chemistry models feature more levels in the stratosphere, a raised model top, and differences in non-orographic gravity wave drag versus their no-chemistry counterparts. Such additional dynamical differences can completely mask the above influence of ozone chemistry. The results point toward a need to retune chemistry-climate models versus their no-chemistry counterparts.

AB - Using nine chemistry-climate and eight associated no-chemistry models, we investigate the persistence and timing of cold episodes occurring in the Arctic and Antarctic stratosphere during the period 1980–2014. We find systematic differences in behavior between members of these model pairs. In a first group of chemistry models whose dynamical configurations mirror their no-chemistry counterparts, we find an increased persistence of such cold polar vortices, such that these cold episodes often start earlier and last longer, relative to the times of occurrence of the lowest temperatures. Also the date of occurrence of the lowest temperatures, both in the Arctic and the Antarctic, is often delayed by 1–3 weeks in chemistry models, versus their no-chemistry counterparts. This behavior exacerbates a widespread problem occurring in most or all models, a delayed occurrence, in the median, of the most anomalously cold day during such cold winters. In a second group of model pairs there are differences beyond just ozone chemistry. In particular, here the chemistry models feature more levels in the stratosphere, a raised model top, and differences in non-orographic gravity wave drag versus their no-chemistry counterparts. Such additional dynamical differences can completely mask the above influence of ozone chemistry. The results point toward a need to retune chemistry-climate models versus their no-chemistry counterparts.

KW - climate model

KW - deep coupling

KW - non-orographic gravity wave

KW - ozone depletion

KW - ozone-climate interaction

KW - tuning

U2 - 10.1029/2022JD037123

DO - 10.1029/2022JD037123

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85141710964

VL - 127

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

SN - 2169-897X

IS - 20

M1 - e2022JD037123

ER -