Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Computer science (CS) or information and commun...

Electronic data

  • Paper CS and ICT Passey

    Accepted author manuscript, 68 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

View graph of relations

Computer science (CS) or information and communication technologies (ICT): the curriculum needs both

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Computer science (CS) or information and communication technologies (ICT): the curriculum needs both. / Passey, Don.
IFIP TC3 Working Conference “A New Culture of Learning : Computing and next Generations”: Proceedings. ed. / Andrej Brodnik; Cathy Lewin. Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania: IFIP, 2015. p. 26-44.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

Passey, D 2015, Computer science (CS) or information and communication technologies (ICT): the curriculum needs both. in A Brodnik & C Lewin (eds), IFIP TC3 Working Conference “A New Culture of Learning : Computing and next Generations”: Proceedings. IFIP, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania, pp. 26-44, IFIP TC3 Working Conference “A New Culture of Learning: Computing and next Generations”, Vilnius, Lithuania, 1/07/15. <http://www.ifip2015.mii.vu.lt/file/repository/IFIP_Proceedings.pdf>

APA

Passey, D. (2015). Computer science (CS) or information and communication technologies (ICT): the curriculum needs both. In A. Brodnik, & C. Lewin (Eds.), IFIP TC3 Working Conference “A New Culture of Learning : Computing and next Generations”: Proceedings (pp. 26-44). IFIP. http://www.ifip2015.mii.vu.lt/file/repository/IFIP_Proceedings.pdf

Vancouver

Passey D. Computer science (CS) or information and communication technologies (ICT): the curriculum needs both. In Brodnik A, Lewin C, editors, IFIP TC3 Working Conference “A New Culture of Learning : Computing and next Generations”: Proceedings. Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania: IFIP. 2015. p. 26-44

Author

Passey, Don. / Computer science (CS) or information and communication technologies (ICT) : the curriculum needs both. IFIP TC3 Working Conference “A New Culture of Learning : Computing and next Generations”: Proceedings. editor / Andrej Brodnik ; Cathy Lewin. Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania : IFIP, 2015. pp. 26-44

Bibtex

@inproceedings{0480a0e3edc14b72a2da244f2a31d883,
title = "Computer science (CS) or information and communication technologies (ICT): the curriculum needs both",
abstract = "The subject of computer science (CS) has relatively recently arisen within the curriculum; yet it has been quickly followed by in-depth study and creative application. In 1962, Purdue and Stanford Universities established perhaps the first departments of computer science; the first PhD in computer science was awarded in 1965 by the University of Pennsylvania, while a robotic hand was developed in the same year at the University of Belgrade. Soon after, the subject started to appear in curricula for younger students. Since the 1980s, there have been concerns that computing and technologies should play a major role in school curricula and practice. Ways to bridge school and university curricula have been hotly debated. Up to this present time, in parallel and in ways that some would say have demonstrated mistaken appropriation, a major focus of technologies in the school curriculum has in many countries been on applications of existing technologies into subject practice (both software, such as office applications, and hardware, such as robots and sensors). Through uses of these applications, information and communications technologies (ICT) have focused on activities to support subject and topic learning (across wide age and subject ranges). Limitations of staffing and resources have in the past been considered reasons for choice between ICT or CS curricula. Very recently, the concern for including computers in the curriculum (certainly in England and Australia, for example) has shifted to a much greater focus on computing and CS, more concerned with the uses of and development of programming and problem-solving. Across the world, policy makers at national, regional and local levels are concerned about this shift: whether the shift should be made; how it can be made; and how it can be made effective for teachers and learners. The limitations that once existed appear to have gone; yet key questions remain. This is a time of great opportunity, for building CS and ICT into curricula to support long-term needs. But, how can effective policies, that enable future generations, consider the vital concerns that go beyond what might be regarded as a simple move from ICT to CS? How can we integrate e-learning and e-ducation practices to support a new culture of learning? These key questions are explored here, and conclusions argue for a focus on future practices rather than on poorly-reflected decisions.",
keywords = "learning, computing, educational trends, learning cultures, computing and learning",
author = "Don Passey",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
pages = "26--44",
editor = "Andrej Brodnik and Cathy Lewin",
booktitle = "IFIP TC3 Working Conference “A New Culture of Learning : Computing and next Generations”",
publisher = "IFIP",
note = "IFIP TC3 Working Conference “A New Culture of Learning: Computing and next Generations” ; Conference date: 01-07-2015 Through 03-07-2015",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Computer science (CS) or information and communication technologies (ICT)

T2 - IFIP TC3 Working Conference “A New Culture of Learning: Computing and next Generations”

AU - Passey, Don

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The subject of computer science (CS) has relatively recently arisen within the curriculum; yet it has been quickly followed by in-depth study and creative application. In 1962, Purdue and Stanford Universities established perhaps the first departments of computer science; the first PhD in computer science was awarded in 1965 by the University of Pennsylvania, while a robotic hand was developed in the same year at the University of Belgrade. Soon after, the subject started to appear in curricula for younger students. Since the 1980s, there have been concerns that computing and technologies should play a major role in school curricula and practice. Ways to bridge school and university curricula have been hotly debated. Up to this present time, in parallel and in ways that some would say have demonstrated mistaken appropriation, a major focus of technologies in the school curriculum has in many countries been on applications of existing technologies into subject practice (both software, such as office applications, and hardware, such as robots and sensors). Through uses of these applications, information and communications technologies (ICT) have focused on activities to support subject and topic learning (across wide age and subject ranges). Limitations of staffing and resources have in the past been considered reasons for choice between ICT or CS curricula. Very recently, the concern for including computers in the curriculum (certainly in England and Australia, for example) has shifted to a much greater focus on computing and CS, more concerned with the uses of and development of programming and problem-solving. Across the world, policy makers at national, regional and local levels are concerned about this shift: whether the shift should be made; how it can be made; and how it can be made effective for teachers and learners. The limitations that once existed appear to have gone; yet key questions remain. This is a time of great opportunity, for building CS and ICT into curricula to support long-term needs. But, how can effective policies, that enable future generations, consider the vital concerns that go beyond what might be regarded as a simple move from ICT to CS? How can we integrate e-learning and e-ducation practices to support a new culture of learning? These key questions are explored here, and conclusions argue for a focus on future practices rather than on poorly-reflected decisions.

AB - The subject of computer science (CS) has relatively recently arisen within the curriculum; yet it has been quickly followed by in-depth study and creative application. In 1962, Purdue and Stanford Universities established perhaps the first departments of computer science; the first PhD in computer science was awarded in 1965 by the University of Pennsylvania, while a robotic hand was developed in the same year at the University of Belgrade. Soon after, the subject started to appear in curricula for younger students. Since the 1980s, there have been concerns that computing and technologies should play a major role in school curricula and practice. Ways to bridge school and university curricula have been hotly debated. Up to this present time, in parallel and in ways that some would say have demonstrated mistaken appropriation, a major focus of technologies in the school curriculum has in many countries been on applications of existing technologies into subject practice (both software, such as office applications, and hardware, such as robots and sensors). Through uses of these applications, information and communications technologies (ICT) have focused on activities to support subject and topic learning (across wide age and subject ranges). Limitations of staffing and resources have in the past been considered reasons for choice between ICT or CS curricula. Very recently, the concern for including computers in the curriculum (certainly in England and Australia, for example) has shifted to a much greater focus on computing and CS, more concerned with the uses of and development of programming and problem-solving. Across the world, policy makers at national, regional and local levels are concerned about this shift: whether the shift should be made; how it can be made; and how it can be made effective for teachers and learners. The limitations that once existed appear to have gone; yet key questions remain. This is a time of great opportunity, for building CS and ICT into curricula to support long-term needs. But, how can effective policies, that enable future generations, consider the vital concerns that go beyond what might be regarded as a simple move from ICT to CS? How can we integrate e-learning and e-ducation practices to support a new culture of learning? These key questions are explored here, and conclusions argue for a focus on future practices rather than on poorly-reflected decisions.

KW - learning

KW - computing

KW - educational trends

KW - learning cultures

KW - computing and learning

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

SP - 26

EP - 44

BT - IFIP TC3 Working Conference “A New Culture of Learning : Computing and next Generations”

A2 - Brodnik, Andrej

A2 - Lewin, Cathy

PB - IFIP

CY - Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

Y2 - 1 July 2015 through 3 July 2015

ER -