Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Designing trials of Universal Basic Income for ...

Electronic data

  • Designing Trials of UBI for Health Impact Named

    Rights statement: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Matthew Thomas Johnson, Elliott Aidan Johnson, Daniel Nettle, Kate E Pickett, Designing trials of Universal Basic Income for health impact: identifying interdisciplinary questions to address, Journal of Public Health, 2021, fdaa255 is available online at:

    Accepted author manuscript, 368 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Designing trials of Universal Basic Income for health impact: identifying interdisciplinary questions to address

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>14/01/2021
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom)
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Background
A large body of evidence indicates the importance of upstream determinants to health. Universal Basic Income (UBI) has been suggested as an upstream intervention capable of promoting health by affecting material, biopsychosocial and behavioural determinants. Calls are emerging across the political spectrum to introduce an emergency UBI to address socio-economic insecurity. However, although existing studies indicate effects on health through cash transfers, UBI schemes have not previously been designed specifically to promote health.

Methods
In this article, we scope the existing literature to set out a set of interdisciplinary research challenges to address in designing a trial of the effectiveness of UBI as a population health measure.

Results
We present a theoretical model of impact that identifies three pathways to health impact, before identifying open questions related to regularity, size of payment, needs-based supplements, personality and behaviour, conditionality, and duration.

Conclusions
These results set, for the first time, a set of research activities required in order to maximise health impact in UBI programmes.

Keywords: Public health; Universal Basic Income; public policy; socio-economic status