TY - JOUR

T1 - Did paying drugs misuse treatment providers for outcomes lead to unintended consequences for hospital admissions?

T2 - Difference-in-differences analysis of a pay-for-performance scheme in England

AU - Mason, T.

AU - Whittaker, W.

AU - Jones, A.

AU - Sutton, M.

PY - 2021/11/30

Y1 - 2021/11/30

N2 - Aims: To estimate how a scheme to pay substance misuse treatment service providers according to treatment outcomes affected hospital admissions. Design: A controlled, quasi-experimental (difference-in-differences) observational study using negative binomial regression. Setting: Hospitals in all 149 organisational areas in England for the period 2009–2010 to 2015–2016. Participants: 572 545 patients admitted to hospital with a diagnosis indicating drug misuse, defined based on International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes (37 964 patients in 8 intervention areas and 534 581 in 141 comparison areas). Intervention and comparators: Linkage of provider payments to recovery outcome indicators in 8 intervention organisational areas compared with all 141 comparison organisational areas in England. Outcome indicators included: abstinence from presenting substance, abstinent completion of treatment and non-re-presentation to treatment in the 12 months following completion. Measurements: Annual counts of hospital admissions, emergency admissions and admissions including a diagnosis indicating drugs misuse. Covariates included age, sex, ethnic origin and deprivation. Findings: For 37 245 patients in the intervention areas, annual emergency admissions were 1.073 times higher during the operation of the scheme compared with non-intervention areas (95% CI = 1.049; 1.097). There were an estimated additional 3 352 emergency admissions in intervention areas during the scheme. These findings were robust to a range of secondary analyses. Conclusion: A programme in England from 2012 to 2014 to pay substance misuse treatment service providers according to treatment outcomes appeared to increase emergency hospital admissions.

AB - Aims: To estimate how a scheme to pay substance misuse treatment service providers according to treatment outcomes affected hospital admissions. Design: A controlled, quasi-experimental (difference-in-differences) observational study using negative binomial regression. Setting: Hospitals in all 149 organisational areas in England for the period 2009–2010 to 2015–2016. Participants: 572 545 patients admitted to hospital with a diagnosis indicating drug misuse, defined based on International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes (37 964 patients in 8 intervention areas and 534 581 in 141 comparison areas). Intervention and comparators: Linkage of provider payments to recovery outcome indicators in 8 intervention organisational areas compared with all 141 comparison organisational areas in England. Outcome indicators included: abstinence from presenting substance, abstinent completion of treatment and non-re-presentation to treatment in the 12 months following completion. Measurements: Annual counts of hospital admissions, emergency admissions and admissions including a diagnosis indicating drugs misuse. Covariates included age, sex, ethnic origin and deprivation. Findings: For 37 245 patients in the intervention areas, annual emergency admissions were 1.073 times higher during the operation of the scheme compared with non-intervention areas (95% CI = 1.049; 1.097). There were an estimated additional 3 352 emergency admissions in intervention areas during the scheme. These findings were robust to a range of secondary analyses. Conclusion: A programme in England from 2012 to 2014 to pay substance misuse treatment service providers according to treatment outcomes appeared to increase emergency hospital admissions.

U2 - 10.1111/add.15486

DO - 10.1111/add.15486

M3 - Journal article

VL - 116

SP - 3082

EP - 3093

JO - Addiction

JF - Addiction

SN - 0965-2140

IS - 11

ER -