Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Does better than expected life expectancy in ar...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Does better than expected life expectancy in areas of disadvantage indicate health resilience?: Stakeholder perspectives and possible explanations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Does better than expected life expectancy in areas of disadvantage indicate health resilience? Stakeholder perspectives and possible explanations. / Mead, R.; Rinaldi, C.; McGill, E. et al.
In: Health and Place, Vol. 87, 103242, 31.05.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Mead R, Rinaldi C, McGill E, Egan M, Popay J, Hartwell G et al. Does better than expected life expectancy in areas of disadvantage indicate health resilience? Stakeholder perspectives and possible explanations. Health and Place. 2024 May 31;87:103242. Epub 2024 Apr 30. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103242

Author

Bibtex

@article{0eeabbf903f04a3ba5da6fb1f48b32db,
title = "Does better than expected life expectancy in areas of disadvantage indicate health resilience?: Stakeholder perspectives and possible explanations",
abstract = "Some places have better than expected health trends despite being disadvantaged in other ways. Thematic analysis of qualitative data from stakeholders (N = 25) in two case studies of disadvantaged local authorities the North West and South East of England assessed explanations for the localities{\textquoteright} apparent health resilience. Participants identified ways of working that might contribute to improved life expectancy, such as partnering with third sector, targeting and outcome driven action. Stakeholders were reluctant to assume credit for better-than-expected health outcomes. External factors such as population change, national politics and finances were considered crucial. Local public health stakeholders regard their work as important but unlikely to cause place-centred health resilience. ",
keywords = "Health inequalities, Partnership, Place-based, Policy, Resilience, Article, clinical outcome, disease burden, finance, health disparity, human, income, life expectancy, politics, psychological resilience, trend study, vulnerable population",
author = "R. Mead and C. Rinaldi and E. McGill and M. Egan and J. Popay and G. Hartwell and K. Daras and A. Edwards and M. Lhussier",
year = "2024",
month = may,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103242",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
journal = "Health and Place",
issn = "1353-8292",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does better than expected life expectancy in areas of disadvantage indicate health resilience?

T2 - Stakeholder perspectives and possible explanations

AU - Mead, R.

AU - Rinaldi, C.

AU - McGill, E.

AU - Egan, M.

AU - Popay, J.

AU - Hartwell, G.

AU - Daras, K.

AU - Edwards, A.

AU - Lhussier, M.

PY - 2024/5/31

Y1 - 2024/5/31

N2 - Some places have better than expected health trends despite being disadvantaged in other ways. Thematic analysis of qualitative data from stakeholders (N = 25) in two case studies of disadvantaged local authorities the North West and South East of England assessed explanations for the localities’ apparent health resilience. Participants identified ways of working that might contribute to improved life expectancy, such as partnering with third sector, targeting and outcome driven action. Stakeholders were reluctant to assume credit for better-than-expected health outcomes. External factors such as population change, national politics and finances were considered crucial. Local public health stakeholders regard their work as important but unlikely to cause place-centred health resilience.

AB - Some places have better than expected health trends despite being disadvantaged in other ways. Thematic analysis of qualitative data from stakeholders (N = 25) in two case studies of disadvantaged local authorities the North West and South East of England assessed explanations for the localities’ apparent health resilience. Participants identified ways of working that might contribute to improved life expectancy, such as partnering with third sector, targeting and outcome driven action. Stakeholders were reluctant to assume credit for better-than-expected health outcomes. External factors such as population change, national politics and finances were considered crucial. Local public health stakeholders regard their work as important but unlikely to cause place-centred health resilience.

KW - Health inequalities

KW - Partnership

KW - Place-based

KW - Policy

KW - Resilience

KW - Article

KW - clinical outcome

KW - disease burden

KW - finance

KW - health disparity

KW - human

KW - income

KW - life expectancy

KW - politics

KW - psychological resilience

KW - trend study

KW - vulnerable population

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103242

DO - 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103242

M3 - Journal article

VL - 87

JO - Health and Place

JF - Health and Place

SN - 1353-8292

M1 - 103242

ER -