Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Effect of Fenofibrate on Progression of Diabeti...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Effect of Fenofibrate on Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • David Preiss
  • Jennifer Logue
  • Emily Sammons
  • Mohammed Zayed
  • Jonathan Emberson
  • Rachel Wade
  • Karl Wallendszus
  • Will Stevens
  • Rosanna Cretney
  • Simon Harding
  • Graham Leese
  • Gemma Currie
  • Jane Armitage
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/08/2024
<mark>Journal</mark>NEJM Evidence
Issue number8
Volume3
Pages (from-to)EVIDoa2400179
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date21/06/24
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Findings from cardiovascular outcome trials suggest that fenofibrate therapy may reduce the progression of diabetic retinopathy.
METHODS
We recruited and followed adults with nonreferable diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy using the national Diabetic Eye Screening (DES) program in Scotland. We randomly assigned participants to receive 145-mg fenofibrate tablets or placebo (taken daily or, in those with impaired renal function, on alternate days). The primary outcome was a composite of developing referable diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy (based on Scotland’s DES grading scheme) or treatment (intravitreal injection, retinal laser, vitrectomy) for retinopathy or maculopathy.
RESULTS
A total of 1151 participants were randomly assigned to treatment. During a median of 4.0 years, progression to referable diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy, or treatment thereof, occurred in 131 (22.7%) of 576 participants in the fenofibrate group and 168 (29.2%) of 575 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.91; P=0.006). In the fenofibrate group compared with the placebo group, the frequencies for any progression of retinopathy or maculopathy were 185 (32.1%) vs. 231 (40.2%); hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.90 and for the development of macular edema were 22 (3.8%) vs. 43 (7.5%); hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.84. Seventeen (3.0%) participants assigned fenofibrate and 28 (4.9%) assigned placebo were given treatment for retinopathy (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.06). There was no effect on visual function, quality of life, or visual acuity. Trial-averaged estimated glomerular filtration rate was 7.9 (95% CI, 6.8 to 9.1) ml/min/1.73 m2 lower in participants in the fenofibrate group compared with the placebo group. Serious adverse events occurred in 208 (36.1%) participants allocated fenofibrate and 204 (35.5%) participants allocated placebo.
CONCLUSIONS
Fenofibrate reduced progression of diabetic retinopathy compared with placebo among participants with early retinal changes.