Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Facilitating equitable access to hospice care i...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Facilitating equitable access to hospice care in socially deprived areas: A mixed methods multiple case study

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Facilitating equitable access to hospice care in socially deprived areas: A mixed methods multiple case study. / French, Maddy; Keegan, Thomas; Preston, Nancy.
In: Palliative Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 4, 01.04.2023, p. 508-519.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

French M, Keegan T, Preston N. Facilitating equitable access to hospice care in socially deprived areas: A mixed methods multiple case study. Palliative Medicine. 2023 Apr 1;37(4):508-519. Epub 2022 Nov 15. doi: 10.1177/02692163221133977

Author

Bibtex

@article{f98a8bdec658455f9b5609ce9f79465e,
title = "Facilitating equitable access to hospice care in socially deprived areas: A mixed methods multiple case study",
abstract = "Background: There is uncertainty about the factors influencing inequities in access to palliative care in socially deprived areas, including the role of service models and professional perceptions. Aim: To explore the relationship between social deprivation and access to hospice care, including factors influencing access and professional experiences of providing care. Design: A mixed-methods multiple case study approach was used. Hospice referrals data were analysed using generalised linear mixed models and other regression analyses. Qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings from different areas (cases) were compared in a cross-case analysis. Setting: The study took place in North West England, using data from three hospices (8699 hospice patients) and interviews with 42 healthcare professionals. Results: Social deprivation was not statistically significantly, or consistently, associated with hospice referrals in the three cases (Case 1, Incidence Rate Ratio 1.04, p = 0.75; Case 2, Incidence Rate Ratio 1.09, p = 0.15, Case 3, Incidence Rate Ratio 0.88, p = 0.35). Hospice data and interviews suggest the model of hospice care, including working relationship with hospitals, and the local nature of social deprivation influenced access. Circumstances associated with social deprivation can conflict with professional expectations within palliative care. Conclusion: Hospice care in the UK can be organised in ways that facilitate referrals of patients from socially deprived areas, although uncertainty about what constitutes need limits conclusions about equity. Grounding professional narratives around expectations, responsibility, and choice in frameworks that recognise the sociostructural influences on end-of-life circumstances may help to foster more equitable palliative care.",
keywords = "Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, General Medicine",
author = "Maddy French and Thomas Keegan and Nancy Preston",
year = "2023",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/02692163221133977",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "508--519",
journal = "Palliative Medicine",
issn = "0269-2163",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facilitating equitable access to hospice care in socially deprived areas

T2 - A mixed methods multiple case study

AU - French, Maddy

AU - Keegan, Thomas

AU - Preston, Nancy

PY - 2023/4/1

Y1 - 2023/4/1

N2 - Background: There is uncertainty about the factors influencing inequities in access to palliative care in socially deprived areas, including the role of service models and professional perceptions. Aim: To explore the relationship between social deprivation and access to hospice care, including factors influencing access and professional experiences of providing care. Design: A mixed-methods multiple case study approach was used. Hospice referrals data were analysed using generalised linear mixed models and other regression analyses. Qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings from different areas (cases) were compared in a cross-case analysis. Setting: The study took place in North West England, using data from three hospices (8699 hospice patients) and interviews with 42 healthcare professionals. Results: Social deprivation was not statistically significantly, or consistently, associated with hospice referrals in the three cases (Case 1, Incidence Rate Ratio 1.04, p = 0.75; Case 2, Incidence Rate Ratio 1.09, p = 0.15, Case 3, Incidence Rate Ratio 0.88, p = 0.35). Hospice data and interviews suggest the model of hospice care, including working relationship with hospitals, and the local nature of social deprivation influenced access. Circumstances associated with social deprivation can conflict with professional expectations within palliative care. Conclusion: Hospice care in the UK can be organised in ways that facilitate referrals of patients from socially deprived areas, although uncertainty about what constitutes need limits conclusions about equity. Grounding professional narratives around expectations, responsibility, and choice in frameworks that recognise the sociostructural influences on end-of-life circumstances may help to foster more equitable palliative care.

AB - Background: There is uncertainty about the factors influencing inequities in access to palliative care in socially deprived areas, including the role of service models and professional perceptions. Aim: To explore the relationship between social deprivation and access to hospice care, including factors influencing access and professional experiences of providing care. Design: A mixed-methods multiple case study approach was used. Hospice referrals data were analysed using generalised linear mixed models and other regression analyses. Qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings from different areas (cases) were compared in a cross-case analysis. Setting: The study took place in North West England, using data from three hospices (8699 hospice patients) and interviews with 42 healthcare professionals. Results: Social deprivation was not statistically significantly, or consistently, associated with hospice referrals in the three cases (Case 1, Incidence Rate Ratio 1.04, p = 0.75; Case 2, Incidence Rate Ratio 1.09, p = 0.15, Case 3, Incidence Rate Ratio 0.88, p = 0.35). Hospice data and interviews suggest the model of hospice care, including working relationship with hospitals, and the local nature of social deprivation influenced access. Circumstances associated with social deprivation can conflict with professional expectations within palliative care. Conclusion: Hospice care in the UK can be organised in ways that facilitate referrals of patients from socially deprived areas, although uncertainty about what constitutes need limits conclusions about equity. Grounding professional narratives around expectations, responsibility, and choice in frameworks that recognise the sociostructural influences on end-of-life circumstances may help to foster more equitable palliative care.

KW - Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

KW - General Medicine

U2 - 10.1177/02692163221133977

DO - 10.1177/02692163221133977

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36380483

VL - 37

SP - 508

EP - 519

JO - Palliative Medicine

JF - Palliative Medicine

SN - 0269-2163

IS - 4

ER -