Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Generalisations of a Bayesian decision-theoreti...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Generalisations of a Bayesian decision-theoretic randomisation procedure and the impact of delayed responses

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Generalisations of a Bayesian decision-theoretic randomisation procedure and the impact of delayed responses. / Williamson, S.F.; Jacko, P.; Jaki, T.
In: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Vol. 174, 107407, 31.10.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Williamson SF, Jacko P, Jaki T. Generalisations of a Bayesian decision-theoretic randomisation procedure and the impact of delayed responses. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. 2022 Oct 31;174:107407. Epub 2021 Dec 7. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2021.107407

Author

Bibtex

@article{e79a1290212e47c092e31afce6d9e57d,
title = "Generalisations of a Bayesian decision-theoretic randomisation procedure and the impact of delayed responses",
abstract = "The design of sequential experiments and, in particular, randomised controlled trials involves a trade-off between operational characteristics such as statistical power, estimation bias and patient benefit. The family of randomisation procedures referred to as Constrained Randomised Dynamic Programming (CRDP), which is set in the Bayesian decision-theoretic framework, can be used to balance these competing objectives. A generalisation and novel interpretation of CRDP is proposed to highlight its inherent flexibility to adapt to a variety of practicalities and align with individual trial objectives. CRDP, as with most response-adaptive randomisation procedures, hinges on the limiting assumption of patient responses being available before allocation of the next patient. This forms one of the greatest barriers to their implementation in practice which, despite being an important research question, has not received a thorough treatment. Therefore, motivated by the existing gap between the theory of response-adaptive randomisation (which is abundant with proposed methods in the immediate response setting) and clinical practice (in which responses are typically delayed), the performance of CRDP in the presence of fixed and random delays is evaluated. Simulation results show that CRDP continues to offer patient benefit gains over alternative procedures and is relatively robust to delayed responses. To compensate for a fixed delay, a method which adjusts the time horizon used in the optimisation objective is proposed and its performance illustrated. ",
keywords = "Bayesian decision-theoretic model, Clinical trials, Delayed responses, Dynamic programming, Response-adaptive randomisation",
author = "S.F. Williamson and P. Jacko and T. Jaki",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.csda.2021.107407",
language = "English",
volume = "174",
journal = "Computational Statistics and Data Analysis",
issn = "0167-9473",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generalisations of a Bayesian decision-theoretic randomisation procedure and the impact of delayed responses

AU - Williamson, S.F.

AU - Jacko, P.

AU - Jaki, T.

PY - 2022/10/31

Y1 - 2022/10/31

N2 - The design of sequential experiments and, in particular, randomised controlled trials involves a trade-off between operational characteristics such as statistical power, estimation bias and patient benefit. The family of randomisation procedures referred to as Constrained Randomised Dynamic Programming (CRDP), which is set in the Bayesian decision-theoretic framework, can be used to balance these competing objectives. A generalisation and novel interpretation of CRDP is proposed to highlight its inherent flexibility to adapt to a variety of practicalities and align with individual trial objectives. CRDP, as with most response-adaptive randomisation procedures, hinges on the limiting assumption of patient responses being available before allocation of the next patient. This forms one of the greatest barriers to their implementation in practice which, despite being an important research question, has not received a thorough treatment. Therefore, motivated by the existing gap between the theory of response-adaptive randomisation (which is abundant with proposed methods in the immediate response setting) and clinical practice (in which responses are typically delayed), the performance of CRDP in the presence of fixed and random delays is evaluated. Simulation results show that CRDP continues to offer patient benefit gains over alternative procedures and is relatively robust to delayed responses. To compensate for a fixed delay, a method which adjusts the time horizon used in the optimisation objective is proposed and its performance illustrated.

AB - The design of sequential experiments and, in particular, randomised controlled trials involves a trade-off between operational characteristics such as statistical power, estimation bias and patient benefit. The family of randomisation procedures referred to as Constrained Randomised Dynamic Programming (CRDP), which is set in the Bayesian decision-theoretic framework, can be used to balance these competing objectives. A generalisation and novel interpretation of CRDP is proposed to highlight its inherent flexibility to adapt to a variety of practicalities and align with individual trial objectives. CRDP, as with most response-adaptive randomisation procedures, hinges on the limiting assumption of patient responses being available before allocation of the next patient. This forms one of the greatest barriers to their implementation in practice which, despite being an important research question, has not received a thorough treatment. Therefore, motivated by the existing gap between the theory of response-adaptive randomisation (which is abundant with proposed methods in the immediate response setting) and clinical practice (in which responses are typically delayed), the performance of CRDP in the presence of fixed and random delays is evaluated. Simulation results show that CRDP continues to offer patient benefit gains over alternative procedures and is relatively robust to delayed responses. To compensate for a fixed delay, a method which adjusts the time horizon used in the optimisation objective is proposed and its performance illustrated.

KW - Bayesian decision-theoretic model

KW - Clinical trials

KW - Delayed responses

KW - Dynamic programming

KW - Response-adaptive randomisation

U2 - 10.1016/j.csda.2021.107407

DO - 10.1016/j.csda.2021.107407

M3 - Journal article

VL - 174

JO - Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

JF - Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

SN - 0167-9473

M1 - 107407

ER -