Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Glitch or Anti-glitch

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Glitch or Anti-glitch: A Bayesian View

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineLetterpeer-review

Published

Standard

Glitch or Anti-glitch: A Bayesian View. / Hu, Y.-M.; Pitkin, M.; Heng, Ik Siong et al.
In: Astrophysical Journal Letters, Vol. 784, No. 2, L41, 21.03.2014.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineLetterpeer-review

Harvard

Hu, Y-M, Pitkin, M, Heng, IS & Hendry, MA 2014, 'Glitch or Anti-glitch: A Bayesian View', Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 784, no. 2, L41. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/784/2/L41

APA

Hu, Y-M., Pitkin, M., Heng, I. S., & Hendry, M. A. (2014). Glitch or Anti-glitch: A Bayesian View. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 784(2), Article L41. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/784/2/L41

Vancouver

Hu Y-M, Pitkin M, Heng IS, Hendry MA. Glitch or Anti-glitch: A Bayesian View. Astrophysical Journal Letters. 2014 Mar 21;784(2):L41. doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/784/2/L41

Author

Hu, Y.-M. ; Pitkin, M. ; Heng, Ik Siong et al. / Glitch or Anti-glitch : A Bayesian View. In: Astrophysical Journal Letters. 2014 ; Vol. 784, No. 2.

Bibtex

@article{d4d197c22bdf467abf8faef8dadba255,
title = "Glitch or Anti-glitch: A Bayesian View",
abstract = "The sudden spin-down in the rotation of magnetar 1E 2259+586 observed by Archibald et al. was a rare event. However, that particular event, referred to as an anti-glitch, was followed by another event, which Archibald et al. suggested could either be a conventional glitch or another anti-glitch. Although there is no accompanying radiation activity or pulse profile change, there is decisive evidence of the existence of a second timing event, judging from the timing data. We apply a Bayesian Model Selection to quantitatively determine which of these possibilities better explains the observed data. We show that the observed data strongly support the presence of two successive anti-glitches with a Bayes factor, often called the odds ratio, greater than 40. Furthermore, we show that the second anti-glitch has an associated frequency change Δν of –8.2 × 10–8 Hz. We discuss the implications of these results for possible physical mechanisms behind this anti-glitch.",
keywords = "methods: statistical, pulsars: general, pulsars: individual: 1E 2259+586, stars: magnetars",
author = "Y.-M. Hu and M. Pitkin and Heng, {Ik Siong} and Hendry, {M. A.}",
year = "2014",
month = mar,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1088/2041-8205/784/2/L41",
language = "English",
volume = "784",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal Letters",
issn = "2041-8205",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Glitch or Anti-glitch

T2 - A Bayesian View

AU - Hu, Y.-M.

AU - Pitkin, M.

AU - Heng, Ik Siong

AU - Hendry, M. A.

PY - 2014/3/21

Y1 - 2014/3/21

N2 - The sudden spin-down in the rotation of magnetar 1E 2259+586 observed by Archibald et al. was a rare event. However, that particular event, referred to as an anti-glitch, was followed by another event, which Archibald et al. suggested could either be a conventional glitch or another anti-glitch. Although there is no accompanying radiation activity or pulse profile change, there is decisive evidence of the existence of a second timing event, judging from the timing data. We apply a Bayesian Model Selection to quantitatively determine which of these possibilities better explains the observed data. We show that the observed data strongly support the presence of two successive anti-glitches with a Bayes factor, often called the odds ratio, greater than 40. Furthermore, we show that the second anti-glitch has an associated frequency change Δν of –8.2 × 10–8 Hz. We discuss the implications of these results for possible physical mechanisms behind this anti-glitch.

AB - The sudden spin-down in the rotation of magnetar 1E 2259+586 observed by Archibald et al. was a rare event. However, that particular event, referred to as an anti-glitch, was followed by another event, which Archibald et al. suggested could either be a conventional glitch or another anti-glitch. Although there is no accompanying radiation activity or pulse profile change, there is decisive evidence of the existence of a second timing event, judging from the timing data. We apply a Bayesian Model Selection to quantitatively determine which of these possibilities better explains the observed data. We show that the observed data strongly support the presence of two successive anti-glitches with a Bayes factor, often called the odds ratio, greater than 40. Furthermore, we show that the second anti-glitch has an associated frequency change Δν of –8.2 × 10–8 Hz. We discuss the implications of these results for possible physical mechanisms behind this anti-glitch.

KW - methods: statistical

KW - pulsars: general

KW - pulsars: individual: 1E 2259+586

KW - stars: magnetars

U2 - 10.1088/2041-8205/784/2/L41

DO - 10.1088/2041-8205/784/2/L41

M3 - Letter

VL - 784

JO - Astrophysical Journal Letters

JF - Astrophysical Journal Letters

SN - 2041-8205

IS - 2

M1 - L41

ER -