Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > How can food system actors influence food syste...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

How can food system actors influence food system resilience?: A literature review via an actor-based lens

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineReview articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

How can food system actors influence food system resilience? A literature review via an actor-based lens. / Zhang, Jing; Tyfield, David; Liu, Lingxuan.
In: Environmental Research: Food Systems, Vol. 2, No. 2, 022001, 01.06.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Zhang J, Tyfield D, Liu L. How can food system actors influence food system resilience? A literature review via an actor-based lens. Environmental Research: Food Systems. 2025 Jun 1;2(2):022001. Epub 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1088/2976-601x/adce0e

Author

Bibtex

@article{432e9fbd4bf14dbb973ccda91a1b4355,
title = "How can food system actors influence food system resilience?: A literature review via an actor-based lens",
abstract = "A growing body of research highlights the central role that actors play in shaping food system resilience. While individual studies have examined the contributions of specific actors, there remains a lack of synthesis that captures cross-sectoral patterns and underlying mechanisms. This review addresses this gap by analysing empirical evidence on how food system actors influencing food system resilience in the face of disruptions—not through abstract system properties alone, but through their concrete activities, capacities, and relationships. Drawing on studies that focus on producers, intermediaries in the supply chain, and consumers, this review identifies four recurring mechanisms through which actors influence food system resilience: (1) actors{\textquoteright} capability and agency to act under pressure; (2) the diversity of actors and their functions; (3) the connectivity and connections among actors; and (4) actors{\textquoteright} capacity to learn and adapt. These mechanisms underpin the system{\textquoteright}s ability to sustain or reconfigure essential functions during crises. In addition, the review highlights the importance of supportive structures that bind actors to one another and to the broader food system. These include physical and institutional infrastructures such as logistics, energy, natural resources, digital platforms, and governance systems. Actor influence is also shaped by geographic location and position within the value chain, which affect their access to resources and ability to respond. Recognising that actors{\textquoteright} interests may not always align with system-level resilience, it is imperative to critically explore whose resilience is being supported, and for governance approaches that foster collective, system-oriented agency.",
keywords = "agency, mechanism, connectivity, diversity, cross-sectoral patterns, actor, food system resilience",
author = "Jing Zhang and David Tyfield and Lingxuan Liu",
year = "2025",
month = may,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1088/2976-601x/adce0e",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "Environmental Research: Food Systems",
issn = "2976-601X",
publisher = "IOP Publishing",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How can food system actors influence food system resilience?

T2 - A literature review via an actor-based lens

AU - Zhang, Jing

AU - Tyfield, David

AU - Liu, Lingxuan

PY - 2025/5/2

Y1 - 2025/5/2

N2 - A growing body of research highlights the central role that actors play in shaping food system resilience. While individual studies have examined the contributions of specific actors, there remains a lack of synthesis that captures cross-sectoral patterns and underlying mechanisms. This review addresses this gap by analysing empirical evidence on how food system actors influencing food system resilience in the face of disruptions—not through abstract system properties alone, but through their concrete activities, capacities, and relationships. Drawing on studies that focus on producers, intermediaries in the supply chain, and consumers, this review identifies four recurring mechanisms through which actors influence food system resilience: (1) actors’ capability and agency to act under pressure; (2) the diversity of actors and their functions; (3) the connectivity and connections among actors; and (4) actors’ capacity to learn and adapt. These mechanisms underpin the system’s ability to sustain or reconfigure essential functions during crises. In addition, the review highlights the importance of supportive structures that bind actors to one another and to the broader food system. These include physical and institutional infrastructures such as logistics, energy, natural resources, digital platforms, and governance systems. Actor influence is also shaped by geographic location and position within the value chain, which affect their access to resources and ability to respond. Recognising that actors’ interests may not always align with system-level resilience, it is imperative to critically explore whose resilience is being supported, and for governance approaches that foster collective, system-oriented agency.

AB - A growing body of research highlights the central role that actors play in shaping food system resilience. While individual studies have examined the contributions of specific actors, there remains a lack of synthesis that captures cross-sectoral patterns and underlying mechanisms. This review addresses this gap by analysing empirical evidence on how food system actors influencing food system resilience in the face of disruptions—not through abstract system properties alone, but through their concrete activities, capacities, and relationships. Drawing on studies that focus on producers, intermediaries in the supply chain, and consumers, this review identifies four recurring mechanisms through which actors influence food system resilience: (1) actors’ capability and agency to act under pressure; (2) the diversity of actors and their functions; (3) the connectivity and connections among actors; and (4) actors’ capacity to learn and adapt. These mechanisms underpin the system’s ability to sustain or reconfigure essential functions during crises. In addition, the review highlights the importance of supportive structures that bind actors to one another and to the broader food system. These include physical and institutional infrastructures such as logistics, energy, natural resources, digital platforms, and governance systems. Actor influence is also shaped by geographic location and position within the value chain, which affect their access to resources and ability to respond. Recognising that actors’ interests may not always align with system-level resilience, it is imperative to critically explore whose resilience is being supported, and for governance approaches that foster collective, system-oriented agency.

KW - agency

KW - mechanism

KW - connectivity

KW - diversity

KW - cross-sectoral patterns

KW - actor

KW - food system resilience

U2 - 10.1088/2976-601x/adce0e

DO - 10.1088/2976-601x/adce0e

M3 - Review article

VL - 2

JO - Environmental Research: Food Systems

JF - Environmental Research: Food Systems

SN - 2976-601X

IS - 2

M1 - 022001

ER -