Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - How Much Food Can We Grow in Urban Areas?
T2 - Food Production and Crop Yields of Urban Agriculture: A Meta‐Analysis
AU - Payen, Florian Thomas
AU - Evans, Daniel L.
AU - Falagán, Natalia
AU - Hardman, Charlotte A.
AU - Kourmpetli, Sofia
AU - Liu, Lingxuan
AU - Marshall, Rachel
AU - Mead, Bethan R.
AU - Davies, Jessica A. C.
PY - 2022/8/31
Y1 - 2022/8/31
N2 - Urban agriculture can contribute to food security, food system resilience and sustainability at the city level. While studies have examined urban agricultural productivity, we lack systemic knowledge of how agricultural productivity of urban systems compares to conventional agriculture and how productivity varies for different urban spaces (e.g., allotments vs. rooftops vs. indoor farming) and growing systems (e.g., hydroponics vs. soil‐based agriculture). Here, we present a global meta‐analysis that seeks to quantify crop yields of urban agriculture for a broad range of crops and explore differences in yields for distinct urban spaces and growing systems. We found 200 studies reporting urban crop yields, from which 2,062 observations were extracted. Lettuces and chicories were the most studied urban grown crops. We observed high agronomic suitability of urban areas, with urban agricultural yields on par with or greater than global average conventional agricultural yields. “Cucumbers and gherkins” was the category of crops for which differences in yields between urban and conventional agriculture were the greatest (17 kg m−2 cycle−1 vs. 3.8 kg m−2 cycle−1). Some urban spaces and growing systems also had a significant effect on specific crop yields (e.g., tomato yields in hydroponic systems were significantly greater than tomato yields in soil‐based systems). This analysis provides a more robust, globally relevant evidence base on the productivity of urban agriculture that can be used in future research and practice relating to urban agriculture, especially in scaling‐up studies aiming to estimate the self‐sufficiency of cities and towns and their potential to meet local food demand.
AB - Urban agriculture can contribute to food security, food system resilience and sustainability at the city level. While studies have examined urban agricultural productivity, we lack systemic knowledge of how agricultural productivity of urban systems compares to conventional agriculture and how productivity varies for different urban spaces (e.g., allotments vs. rooftops vs. indoor farming) and growing systems (e.g., hydroponics vs. soil‐based agriculture). Here, we present a global meta‐analysis that seeks to quantify crop yields of urban agriculture for a broad range of crops and explore differences in yields for distinct urban spaces and growing systems. We found 200 studies reporting urban crop yields, from which 2,062 observations were extracted. Lettuces and chicories were the most studied urban grown crops. We observed high agronomic suitability of urban areas, with urban agricultural yields on par with or greater than global average conventional agricultural yields. “Cucumbers and gherkins” was the category of crops for which differences in yields between urban and conventional agriculture were the greatest (17 kg m−2 cycle−1 vs. 3.8 kg m−2 cycle−1). Some urban spaces and growing systems also had a significant effect on specific crop yields (e.g., tomato yields in hydroponic systems were significantly greater than tomato yields in soil‐based systems). This analysis provides a more robust, globally relevant evidence base on the productivity of urban agriculture that can be used in future research and practice relating to urban agriculture, especially in scaling‐up studies aiming to estimate the self‐sufficiency of cities and towns and their potential to meet local food demand.
KW - ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE
KW - Aerosols and particles
KW - Pollution: urban and regional
KW - BIOGEOSCIENCES
KW - Agricultural systems
KW - Restoration
KW - Urban systems
KW - General or miscellaneous
KW - Pollution: urban, regional and global
KW - GLOBAL CHANGE
KW - OCEANOGRAPHY: GENERAL
KW - Marine pollution
KW - NATURAL HAZARDS
KW - Megacities and urban environment
KW - OCEANOGRAPHY: BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL
KW - Aerosols
KW - PALEOCEANOGRAPHY
KW - Research Article
KW - urban food growing
KW - urban spaces
KW - growing systems
KW - agricultural productivity
KW - food security
KW - urban resilience
U2 - 10.1029/2022ef002748
DO - 10.1029/2022ef002748
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36246543
VL - 10
SP - e2022EF002748
JO - Earth's Future
JF - Earth's Future
SN - 2328-4277
IS - 8
M1 - e2022EF002748
ER -