Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Myths and Methodologies

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • 6963_2_merged_1718099374

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.34 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Myths and Methodologies: Assessing glycaemic control and associated regulatory mechanisms in human physiology research

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>30/08/2024
<mark>Journal</mark>Experimental Physiology
Issue number9
Volume109
Number of pages17
Pages (from-to)1461-1477
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date16/07/24
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

AbstractAccurate measurements of glycaemic control and the underpinning regulatory mechanisms are vital in human physiology research. Glycaemic control is the maintenance of blood glucose concentrations within optimal levels and is governed by physiological variables including insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance and β‐cell function. These can be measured with a plethora of methods, all with their own benefits and limitations. Deciding on the best method to use is challenging and depends on the specific research question(s). This review therefore discusses the theory and procedure, validity and reliability and any special considerations of a range common methods used to measure glycaemic control, insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance and β‐cell function. Methods reviewed include glycosylated haemoglobin, continuous glucose monitors, the oral glucose tolerance test, mixed meal tolerance test, hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp, hyperglycaemic clamp, intravenous glucose tolerance test and indices derived from both fasting concentrations and the oral glucose tolerance test. This review aims to help direct understanding, assessment and decisions regarding which method to use based on specific physiology‐related research questions.