Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI)
T2 - A collective reflection from the educational landscape
AU - Bozkurt, Aras
AU - Xiao, Junhong
AU - Lambert, Sarah
AU - Pazurek, Angelica
AU - Crompton, Helen
AU - Koseoglu, Suzan
AU - Farrow, Robert
AU - Bond, Melissa
AU - Nerantzi, Chrissi
AU - Honeychurch, Sarah
AU - Bali, Maha
AU - Dron, Jon
AU - Mir, Kamran
AU - Stewart, Bonnie
AU - Costello, Eamon
AU - Mason, Jon
AU - Stracke, Christian M.
AU - Romero-Hall, Enilda
AU - Koutropoulos, Apostolos
AU - Toquero, Cathy Mae
AU - Singh, Lenandlar
AU - Tlili, Ahmed
AU - Lee, Kyungmee
AU - Nichols, Mark
AU - Ossiannilsson, Ebba
AU - Brown, Mark
AU - Irvine, Valerie
AU - Raffaghelli, Juliana Elisa
AU - Santos-Hermosa, Gema
AU - Farrell, Orna
AU - Adam, Taskeen
AU - Thong, Ying Li
AU - Sani-Bozkurt, Sunagul
AU - Sharma, Ramesh C.
AU - Hrastinski, Stefan
AU - Jandrić, Petar
PY - 2023/3/14
Y1 - 2023/3/14
N2 - While ChatGPT has recently become very popular, AI has a long history and philosophy. This paper intends to explore the promises and pitfalls of the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) AI and potentially future technologies by adopting a speculative methodology. Speculative future narratives with a specific focus on educational contexts are provided in an attempt to identify emerging themes and discuss their implications for education in the 21st century. Affordances of (using) AI in Education (AIEd) and possible adverse effects are identified and discussed which emerge from the narratives. It is argued that now is the best of times to define human vs AI contribution to education because AI can accomplish more and more educational activities that used to be the prerogative of human educators. Therefore, it is imperative to rethink the respective roles of technology and human educators in education with a future-oriented mindset.
AB - While ChatGPT has recently become very popular, AI has a long history and philosophy. This paper intends to explore the promises and pitfalls of the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) AI and potentially future technologies by adopting a speculative methodology. Speculative future narratives with a specific focus on educational contexts are provided in an attempt to identify emerging themes and discuss their implications for education in the 21st century. Affordances of (using) AI in Education (AIEd) and possible adverse effects are identified and discussed which emerge from the narratives. It is argued that now is the best of times to define human vs AI contribution to education because AI can accomplish more and more educational activities that used to be the prerogative of human educators. Therefore, it is imperative to rethink the respective roles of technology and human educators in education with a future-oriented mindset.
U2 - 10.5281/zenodo.7636568
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.7636568
M3 - Journal article
VL - 18
SP - 53
EP - 130
JO - Asian Journal of Distance Education
JF - Asian Journal of Distance Education
IS - 1
ER -