Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Systematic evidence maps as a novel tool to sup...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Systematic evidence maps as a novel tool to support evidence-based decision-making in chemicals policy and risk management

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Systematic evidence maps as a novel tool to support evidence-based decision-making in chemicals policy and risk management. / Wolffe, Taylor; Whaley, Paul; Halsall, Crispin et al.
In: Environment International, Vol. 130, 104871, 01.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Wolffe T, Whaley P, Halsall C, Rooney A, Walker V. Systematic evidence maps as a novel tool to support evidence-based decision-making in chemicals policy and risk management. Environment International. 2019 Sept 1;130:104871. Epub 2019 Jun 26. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.065

Author

Bibtex

@article{867688b7f5394e4ab6414790874b7170,
title = "Systematic evidence maps as a novel tool to support evidence-based decision-making in chemicals policy and risk management",
abstract = "BackgroundWhile systematic review (SR) methods are gaining traction as a method for providing a reliable summary of existing evidence for health risks posed by exposure to chemical substances, it is becoming clear that their value is restricted to a specific range of risk management scenarios - in particular, those which can be addressed with tightly focused questions and can accommodate the time and resource requirements of a systematic evidence synthesis.MethodsThe concept of a systematic evidence map (SEM) is defined and contrasted to the function and limitations of systematic review (SR) in the context of risk management decision-making. The potential for SEMs to facilitate evidence-based decision-making are explored using a hypothetical example in risk management priority-setting. The potential role of SEMs in reference to broader risk management workflows is characterised.ResultsSEMs are databases of systematically gathered research which characterise broad features of the evidence base. Although not intended to substitute for the evidence synthesis element of systematic reviews, SEMs provide a comprehensive, queryable summary of a large body of policy relevant research. They provide an evidence-based approach to characterising the extent of available evidence and support forward looking predictions or trendspotting in the chemical risk sciences. In particular, SEMs facilitate the identification of related bodies of decision critical chemical risk information which could be further analysed using SR methods, and highlight gaps in the evidence which could be addressed with additional primary studies to reduce uncertainties in decision-making.ConclusionsSEMs have strong and growing potential as a high value tool in resource efficient use of existing research in chemical risk management. They can be used as a critical precursor to efficient deployment of high quality SR methods for characterising chemical health risks. Furthermore, SEMs have potential, at a large scale, to support the sort of evidence summarisation and surveillance methods which would greatly increase the resource efficiency, transparency and effectiveness of regulatory initiatives such as EU REACH and US TSCA.",
keywords = "Systematic review, Evidence mapping",
author = "Taylor Wolffe and Paul Whaley and Crispin Halsall and Andrew Rooney and Vickie Walker",
year = "2019",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.065",
language = "English",
volume = "130",
journal = "Environment International",
issn = "0160-4120",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic evidence maps as a novel tool to support evidence-based decision-making in chemicals policy and risk management

AU - Wolffe, Taylor

AU - Whaley, Paul

AU - Halsall, Crispin

AU - Rooney, Andrew

AU - Walker, Vickie

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - BackgroundWhile systematic review (SR) methods are gaining traction as a method for providing a reliable summary of existing evidence for health risks posed by exposure to chemical substances, it is becoming clear that their value is restricted to a specific range of risk management scenarios - in particular, those which can be addressed with tightly focused questions and can accommodate the time and resource requirements of a systematic evidence synthesis.MethodsThe concept of a systematic evidence map (SEM) is defined and contrasted to the function and limitations of systematic review (SR) in the context of risk management decision-making. The potential for SEMs to facilitate evidence-based decision-making are explored using a hypothetical example in risk management priority-setting. The potential role of SEMs in reference to broader risk management workflows is characterised.ResultsSEMs are databases of systematically gathered research which characterise broad features of the evidence base. Although not intended to substitute for the evidence synthesis element of systematic reviews, SEMs provide a comprehensive, queryable summary of a large body of policy relevant research. They provide an evidence-based approach to characterising the extent of available evidence and support forward looking predictions or trendspotting in the chemical risk sciences. In particular, SEMs facilitate the identification of related bodies of decision critical chemical risk information which could be further analysed using SR methods, and highlight gaps in the evidence which could be addressed with additional primary studies to reduce uncertainties in decision-making.ConclusionsSEMs have strong and growing potential as a high value tool in resource efficient use of existing research in chemical risk management. They can be used as a critical precursor to efficient deployment of high quality SR methods for characterising chemical health risks. Furthermore, SEMs have potential, at a large scale, to support the sort of evidence summarisation and surveillance methods which would greatly increase the resource efficiency, transparency and effectiveness of regulatory initiatives such as EU REACH and US TSCA.

AB - BackgroundWhile systematic review (SR) methods are gaining traction as a method for providing a reliable summary of existing evidence for health risks posed by exposure to chemical substances, it is becoming clear that their value is restricted to a specific range of risk management scenarios - in particular, those which can be addressed with tightly focused questions and can accommodate the time and resource requirements of a systematic evidence synthesis.MethodsThe concept of a systematic evidence map (SEM) is defined and contrasted to the function and limitations of systematic review (SR) in the context of risk management decision-making. The potential for SEMs to facilitate evidence-based decision-making are explored using a hypothetical example in risk management priority-setting. The potential role of SEMs in reference to broader risk management workflows is characterised.ResultsSEMs are databases of systematically gathered research which characterise broad features of the evidence base. Although not intended to substitute for the evidence synthesis element of systematic reviews, SEMs provide a comprehensive, queryable summary of a large body of policy relevant research. They provide an evidence-based approach to characterising the extent of available evidence and support forward looking predictions or trendspotting in the chemical risk sciences. In particular, SEMs facilitate the identification of related bodies of decision critical chemical risk information which could be further analysed using SR methods, and highlight gaps in the evidence which could be addressed with additional primary studies to reduce uncertainties in decision-making.ConclusionsSEMs have strong and growing potential as a high value tool in resource efficient use of existing research in chemical risk management. They can be used as a critical precursor to efficient deployment of high quality SR methods for characterising chemical health risks. Furthermore, SEMs have potential, at a large scale, to support the sort of evidence summarisation and surveillance methods which would greatly increase the resource efficiency, transparency and effectiveness of regulatory initiatives such as EU REACH and US TSCA.

KW - Systematic review

KW - Evidence mapping

U2 - 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.065

DO - 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.065

M3 - Journal article

VL - 130

JO - Environment International

JF - Environment International

SN - 0160-4120

M1 - 104871

ER -