Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Two-Step Drawing From Urns

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Two-Step Drawing From Urns

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Two-Step Drawing From Urns. / Kolassa, Stephan.
Operations Research Proceedings 2004. ed. / Hein Fleurin; Dick den Hertog; Peter Kort. Springer, 2005. p. 313-318 (Operations Research Proceedings).

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

Kolassa, S 2005, Two-Step Drawing From Urns. in H Fleurin, D den Hertog & P Kort (eds), Operations Research Proceedings 2004. Operations Research Proceedings, Springer, pp. 313-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27679-3

APA

Kolassa, S. (2005). Two-Step Drawing From Urns. In H. Fleurin, D. den Hertog, & P. Kort (Eds.), Operations Research Proceedings 2004 (pp. 313-318). (Operations Research Proceedings). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27679-3

Vancouver

Kolassa S. Two-Step Drawing From Urns. In Fleurin H, den Hertog D, Kort P, editors, Operations Research Proceedings 2004. Springer. 2005. p. 313-318. (Operations Research Proceedings). doi: 10.1007/3-540-27679-3

Author

Kolassa, Stephan. / Two-Step Drawing From Urns. Operations Research Proceedings 2004. editor / Hein Fleurin ; Dick den Hertog ; Peter Kort. Springer, 2005. pp. 313-318 (Operations Research Proceedings).

Bibtex

@inproceedings{a414a9582cf5483c886489479d38fbe4,
title = "Two-Step Drawing From Urns",
abstract = "Consider the following situation of two-step shortlisting: two experts Alice and Bob are faced with a large number of alternatives which they can only observe imprecisely. They have to choose one of the alternatives, without knowing which one is best. Alice first compiles a shortlist of alternatives by choosing her k best observations. Bob then chooses his best observation among the shortlisted alternatives. Previous research showed that this procedure sometimes yielded worse results than if a single expert made the entire decision himself. Here, we consider an urn containing n — 1 homogeneous balls and one ball with larger weight. When drawing balls at random from the urn, the probability of drawing any one ball is proportional to its weight. Alice draws k balls and puts them in another urn, from which Bob then draws a single ball. Which value of k maximizes the probability that Bob draws the distinguished ball?",
author = "Stephan Kolassa",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1007/3-540-27679-3",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783540242741",
series = "Operations Research Proceedings",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "313--318",
editor = "Fleurin, {Hein } and {den Hertog}, Dick and Peter Kort",
booktitle = "Operations Research Proceedings 2004",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Two-Step Drawing From Urns

AU - Kolassa, Stephan

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Consider the following situation of two-step shortlisting: two experts Alice and Bob are faced with a large number of alternatives which they can only observe imprecisely. They have to choose one of the alternatives, without knowing which one is best. Alice first compiles a shortlist of alternatives by choosing her k best observations. Bob then chooses his best observation among the shortlisted alternatives. Previous research showed that this procedure sometimes yielded worse results than if a single expert made the entire decision himself. Here, we consider an urn containing n — 1 homogeneous balls and one ball with larger weight. When drawing balls at random from the urn, the probability of drawing any one ball is proportional to its weight. Alice draws k balls and puts them in another urn, from which Bob then draws a single ball. Which value of k maximizes the probability that Bob draws the distinguished ball?

AB - Consider the following situation of two-step shortlisting: two experts Alice and Bob are faced with a large number of alternatives which they can only observe imprecisely. They have to choose one of the alternatives, without knowing which one is best. Alice first compiles a shortlist of alternatives by choosing her k best observations. Bob then chooses his best observation among the shortlisted alternatives. Previous research showed that this procedure sometimes yielded worse results than if a single expert made the entire decision himself. Here, we consider an urn containing n — 1 homogeneous balls and one ball with larger weight. When drawing balls at random from the urn, the probability of drawing any one ball is proportional to its weight. Alice draws k balls and puts them in another urn, from which Bob then draws a single ball. Which value of k maximizes the probability that Bob draws the distinguished ball?

U2 - 10.1007/3-540-27679-3

DO - 10.1007/3-540-27679-3

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

SN - 9783540242741

T3 - Operations Research Proceedings

SP - 313

EP - 318

BT - Operations Research Proceedings 2004

A2 - Fleurin, Hein

A2 - den Hertog, Dick

A2 - Kort, Peter

PB - Springer

ER -